Knol: and NOT the Wikipedia Killer

Recently Google announced the public availability of Knol, after a test run of around 7-8 months. Most of the people see it as Wikipedia killer. Though there are similarity between Knol and Wikipedia, there are noticeable difference as follows -

  • The first difference is that Knol is all about articles and not creating encyclopedia. Wikipedia is more subject/topic centered whereas Knol is more article/ author centered.
  • Author can still own the copyright of the article and decide whether s/he wants contribution from others or not. He has also few license options available to choose from. Option for selecting license is not possible with Wikipedia.
  • One major difference that I see it the option for monetization. I had written one post previously that Twitter and FriendFeed should allow monetization, so why not Wikipedia? Google approach definitely encourages sharing and collaboration by adding monetization aspect to the contribution.
  • All articles in Knol is having nofollow attribute, so there will not be an impact on the page rank of the hyperlinked page. Though the link to your blog/ website will not affect PageRank, still you may expect increase in traffic.
  • Knol puts strong emphasis on trust and they have a verification mechanisms. They recommend name verification by telephone or by credit card.
I personally feel that there are more difference than similarity in Knol and Wikipedia. They cater to two different markets and I believe there is sufficient scope for co-exist rather than killing each other.

Instead of Wikipedia, I believe that Knol has more similarities with If you don't know, is a portal where you can get articles on various topics written by prominent authors. Generally all those articles are paid articles and pays to the authors. Seeing Knol's article centric approach, I believe that conceptually Knol is very much similar to the I would prefer calling Knol a "Web 2.0". doesn't give reader of the article any method to contribute to the article similar to Wikipedia. Neither it does allow everybody to publish new articles in different categories. So the contribution is very much restricted in takes the idea of, fixes contribution issue and also incorporates monetization which again promotes contribution. The emphesis on contribution is what makes it "Web 2.0".

I am not saying that is going to kill In fact, in my opinion, there is good possibility for co-existence of all three websites - Knol, Wikipedia and Though I am saying that Google has made available to everybody and we will definitely see excellent knowledge base in future.

Thanks Google.


CG said…
I don't think Knol will be a success the way it presently stands. This is an uncooked product that Google didn't fully test before releasing.

Check out my 2 words on knol at my blog

Popular posts from this blog

Commentaries on Classical Literature of Ayurveda

Buddha Boredom

SEO: How to Find Webpage Age